Learning Management Upgrade

Friday, December 11, 2009

November Steering Committee Minutes

CMS Steering Committee Meeting, November 13, 2009

In attendance: John Sneed, Art Schneider, Rebecca Robinson, Dawn Davis, Chris Hughes, Jeff Edwards and Andy Freed

Moodle Pilot
Andy went over the progress of the moodle pilot
    • Support issues
    • Training issues
    • Migration (largely done by DL)
    • Faculty volunteers (6 at this point)
    • Agreement on compensation for feedback and evaluation
    • Memorandum of understanding – approved by committee
    • Posed question “what questions would the moodle pilot have to answer for the CMS committee to recommend moodle without going to formal RFP?"
    • Consensus seemed to be that basic functionality was available
    • Committee wants to know what tools/features might be given up
    • Committee would still like to see other products as well, maybe not in a full pilot but in a bakeoff scenario.
    • Faculty will communicate pilot involvement to students, link to info from MyPCC
    • Question about training regimen for Part 2 of pilot.
    Visioning updates.
    • We’d like to have representatives from some commercial CMS providers visit and pitch their vision for CMS platform. 
    • If the vision is appropriate for PCC, we may invite them back to do a function demo of their wares.  
    • Committee would still like to hear from other institutions who have migrated to each platform recently. Would like to hear faculty opinions of the process. 
    • Curious if there are any institutions who have left moodle after adopting it. 
    • John and Andy will draft a set of topics and plan for presentations, committee will evaluate next month.
    Quality Matters review of all courses prior/during migration.
    • Contentious issue since there seems to be no ownership of quality evaluations. Courses that do not pass still get taught. Unclear who determines when courses move on. 
    • Committee would like to see a set of technical standards as well as quality standards to meet during a migration (project team) 
    • Will SAC pick “master shell” to be migrated? Is it possible to review all these courses when migrating? 
    • What’s the timeline that the course has to be reviewed during? (3 years, for example) 
    • Can DL say “we won’t migrate courses that don’t meet QM?” If so, how? 
    Training
    • Opened issues for discussion, will continue later. Should training be required, should faculty be compensated? Will it address online teaching or just tools?
    For December 9th
    • Start technical standards for migration with project team 
    • Define vision and topic areas to cover for vendors 
    • Identify similar schools that have moved to another LMS, try to get info on “success” 
    • Look for any institutions that adopted then left moodle.  

    Labels: , ,

    1 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



    << Home